Tonal Bitcoin

From BitcoinWiki
This is the approved revision of this page, as well as being the most recent.
Jump to: navigation, search

Tonal Bitcoin (TBC) is a representation of the Bitcoin system aimed toward people who prefer the Tonal number system.

Number system[edit]

The Tonal number system is an alternative to the decimal and SI ("metric") system, which improves usability by allowing for infinite binary division (note that Bitcoin protocol support is still finite). Instead of counting: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, etc... In tonal, you would count: an, de, ti, go, su, by, ra, me, ni, ko, hu, vy, la, po, fy, ton, ton-an, etc... This means you get common binary divisions like one sixteenth (0.0625 in decimal) as a clean number: 0.1 in tonal. The tonal number system, prior to Bitcoin, already defines everyday units of measure including lengths, time, capacity, weight, power, gold/silver coinage, calendar, temperature, and even postage stamps and music.

For more information on the Tonal system in general, please see the book.

As an altcoin[edit]

While Tonal Bitcoin shares a common blockchain and network with decimal Bitcoin (BTC), it is still also considered to be alternative cryptocurrency ("altcoin") since the units are non-trivially presented differently. That is, merchants who wish to advertise their product to TBC users would be best to advertise an equivalent TBC price alongside the BTC price. Additionally, had a separate block chain ("altchain") been created for TBC, there would have been no advantage to it, and instead enabled a number of abuses and reduced compatibility. Therefore, as an altcoin, TBC demonstrates an ideal way to extend Bitcoin without needing to resort to unnecessary complications.

From the altcoin perspective, TBC is seen to have a number of benefits over more common altchain-based altcoins:

  • It shares the same blockchain as BTC, so benefits from the full security and difficulty backing the Bitcoin blockchain.
  • TBC is mined together with BTC - unlike ordinary merged mining, you don't get BTC plus TBC, just one or the other at your choice.
  • TBC is completely compatible with all Bitcoin addresses: if you send BTC to a TBC client's address, it will automatically get converted and vice-versa.

Tonal Bitcoin is also notably the first altcoin ever, having been created in 2011 January.

Specification[edit]

Please note, that all numbers of TBC and its divisions/multipliers are written in Tonal, not decimal. This means that instead of counting 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10-- you count: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, , 9, , , , , , 10.

Abbreviation Pronunciation Tonal (TBC) Decimal (BTC)
Tam-Bitcoin 1 0000 0000      2 814 749.767 106 56
ᵇTBC Bong-Bitcoin 1 0000      42.949 672 96
ᵐTBC Mill-Bitcoin 1000      2.684 354 56
ˢTBC San-Bitcoin 100      0.167 772 16
ᵗTBC Ton-Bitcoin 10      0.010 485 76
TBC Bitcoin* 1      0.000 655 36
TBCᵗ Bitcoin-ton 0.1    0.000 040 96
TBCˢ Bitcoin-san 0.01   0.000 002 56
TBCᵐ Bitcoin-mill 0.001  0.000 000 16
TBCᵇ Bitcoin-bong 0.0001 0.000 000 01

* Tonal Bitcoin and Decimal Bitcoin can be differentiated by the pronunciation of the numbers. "One bitcoin", "two bitcoin", etc is decimal, but "an bitcoin", "de bitcoin" is tonal.

The total number of Tonal Bitcoins ever (analogous to the 21mil BTC in decimal representation) is just over 7.75059 tam-bitcoin.

Compatible Clients[edit]

While all Bitcoin clients will correctly approximate values in decimal bitcoin, actual Tonal compatibility is sparse.

Guessing TBC or BTC[edit]

Given variable 'value' in base units (uBTCents/TBCᵇ), one can guess whether it is properly Decimal Bitcoin or Tonal Bitcoin with the following pseudo-code:

if ( ! ( this % 0x10000 ) )
	Choose Tonal Bitcoin
if ( ! ( this % 1000000 ) )
	Choose Decimal Bitcoin
if ( ! ( this % 0x100 ) )
	Choose Tonal Bitcoin

Python[edit]

import math

def formatBTC(n, addSign = False):
	s = "%0.2f BTC" % (math.ceil(n * 100) / 100.,)
	if addSign and n >= 0:
		s = "+" + s
	return s

def Bitcoin2BTC(n):
	return n / 100000000.

toTonalDict = dict(((57, u'\ue9d9'), (65, u'\ue9da'), (66, u'\ue9db'), (67, u'\ue9dc'), (68, u'\ue9dd'), (69, u'\ue9de'), (70, u'\ue9df'), (97, u'\ue9da'), (98, u'\ue9db'), (99, u'\ue9dc'), (100, u'\ue9dd'), (101, u'\ue9de'), (102, u'\ue9df')))

def formatTBC(n, addSign = False):
	s = "%x" % n
	n %= 1
	if n:
		s += '.'
		while n:
			n *= 16
			s += "%x" % n
			n %= 1
	s = unicode(s).translate(toTonalDict)
	s += " TBC"
	if addSign and n >= 0:
		s = "+" + s
	return s

def Bitcoin2TBC(n):
	return n / 65536.

def formatBitcoin(n, addSign = False):
	if not n % 0x10000:
		return formatTBC(Bitcoin2TBC(n), addSign);
	if not n % 1000000:
		return formatBTC(Bitcoin2BTC(n), addSign);
	if not n % 0x100:
		return formatTBC(Bitcoin2TBC(n), addSign);
	s = "%d uBTCents" % (n,);
	if addSign and n > 0:
		s = "+" + s;
	return s;

Criticism[edit]

Hexadecimal could be done without new fonts as characters[edit]

The tonal notation is not supported by fonts bundled with popular operating systems, and so usually requires extra fonts to use. Within the programming community there is a widely accepted convention for hexadecimal notation: use A-F for the higher order digits. Thus, one counts 0,1,2,3, ... , 9,A,B,C,D,E,F,10,11 .... There are even two conventions, (which are lacking in tonal notation) for distinguishing a base-16 number from a decimal. The C convention prefixes 0x and the Motorola convention suffixes h. So, the number san, 256 (decimal) would be written 0x100 or 100h. In tonal notation, it would only be written 100, and thus potentially confused with decimal 100 which is 0x64, though this confusion is less of a problem for Bitcoin since the context is always explicit (SI/BTC vs Tonal/TBC units).

Thus hexadecimal notation accomplishes most of the same goals as tonal notation, at least for Bitcoin, with no requirement for changing fonts, thus is more suited to wider usage. Further the prefix and suffix conventions lead to less ambiguity within the tonal community.

However, the goal of Tonal Bitcoin is to bring Bitcoin to Tonal, not to redefine Tonal (which is older than hexadecimal) or advocate change to the number system itself, so this is out of scope. Additionally, hexadecimal would make referring to "a bitcoin" ambiguous - such a value could mean the equivalent of either one or ten in decimal!

Not relevant to Bitcoin[edit]

Contrary to common myth, Bitcoin is not all about anonymity (and in fact, Bitcoin is not even anonymous itself). Most people in the world don't care about anonymity, and Bitcoin would never get off the ground if it had a niche one-issue purpose. Bitcoin is many things to many people, and not everyone has the same ideals or goals in mind. For people who use the Tonal number system, Bitcoin's ability to adapt to it is a "killer feature", and gives them reason to prefer it over their local fiat currencies.

Source[edit]

http://bitcoin.it/

See Also on BitcoinWiki[edit]